<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>greengopost.com &#187; green product branding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greengopost.com/tag/green-product-branding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greengopost.com</link>
	<description>Where Sustainable Meets Sensible</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:37:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pushing Daisies:  The Clorox-method home Wars</title>
		<link>http://greengopost.com/pushing-daisies-the-clorox-method-home-wars/</link>
		<comments>http://greengopost.com/pushing-daisies-the-clorox-method-home-wars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leon Kaye</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food and consumer products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clorox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green product branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home cleaning products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[method home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www.votedaisy.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greengopost.com/?p=4246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Currently the two leaders in the “green” home cleaning products industry are Clorox and method home, both based in my native Bay Area.  7th Generation is not far behind, but is almost an afterthought because the battle between Clorox and method is getting testy.


Both are fine companies in their own right:  I’ve met several Clorox [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Currently the two leaders in the “green” home cleaning products industry are <strong>Clorox</strong> and <strong>method</strong> home, both based in my native Bay Area.  7<sup>th</sup> Generation is not far behind, but is almost an afterthought because the battle between Clorox and method is getting testy.<p></p>


Both are fine companies in their own right:  I’ve met several Clorox employees and alumni over the years, and they have been impressive people coming from a solid, innovative corporate culture.  But let’s just face it:  method’s product messaging and growth over the last few years has been impressive.  And I admit some bias:  I buy method home for virtually all of our house cleaning needs because their products, in my view, are better.<p></p>
<span id="more-4246"></span>


Well, Clorox recently sent method a nasty-gram in the form of a cease-and-desist letter saying that method should stop using a daisy in any of its advertisement campaigns.  It’s an odd move:  last I checked the daisy was in the public domain.  It really does not do anything for Clorox except make the firm petty and small.  And by the way, their daisies don’t look similar at all.  I mean, it’s not like a sporting goods company stealing Adidas’s three stripes.  The daisy belongs to nature.  It makes me wonder if Canada and the USA ever got into a row over Niagara Falls.<p></p>


<a href="http://www.triplepundit.com/2010/03/who-will-clean-up-method-or-clorox/">The difference between the two firm’s products</a> striking:  While Clorox pushes the “green” message with gusto and touts “natural” ingredients while not exactly being clear about what those ingredients are . . . method home does not beat the over-used and clichéd green drum at all.  method emphasizes performance and innovation, and it shows in their product line:  modern, vibrant colors, cool packaging that is thoughtful (and recycled), and best of all, its web site showcases an impressive overview of what the company strives for in maintaining a sustainable operation.  They don’t preach “green” (thank goodness); they just do it and let the product line speak for itself.<p></p>


Back to the cease-and-desist letter:  rather than stooping to Clorox’s level, method is having some brilliant fun with the love note.  <a href="http://votedaisy.com/">You can visit a site</a> that asks to whom the daisy belongs:  method, Clorox, or Mother Nature.  I admit I voted out of bias, but Mother Nature is the clear winner so far.<p></p>


It’s one of the silliest cat fights since Smuckers, the jelly company, sued a Midwestern company in the early 2000s, basically saying it had the patented right to the peanut butter and jelly sandwich.  I don’t know who will win this round, but so far, method 1, Clorox a big childish ZERO.<p></p>


<em>Special thanks to a reader who alerted me about this story!</em><p></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greengopost.com/pushing-daisies-the-clorox-method-home-wars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Branding in a green world</title>
		<link>http://greengopost.com/branding-in-a-green-world/</link>
		<comments>http://greengopost.com/branding-in-a-green-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leon Kaye</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green product branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http://thedirective.blogspot.com/]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kat Shoa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greengopost.com/?p=3051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to Target a Wide Audience with Green Products
Co-written with Kat Shoa, www.katshoa.com, who specializes in marketing strategy.
Despite the economic downturn, companies and consumers continue to demonstrate an interest in green products and sustainable business practices due to concerns about energy independence, the world we will leave for future generations, waste management, environmental pollution, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3053" title="can your brand soar and cross that bridge?" src="http://greengopost.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/100_1884-300x225.jpg" alt="can your brand soar and cross that bridge?" width="300" height="225" />How to Target a Wide Audience with Green Products</h3><p></p>
<b>Co-written with Kat Shoa, <a href="http://www.katshoa.com" target="_blank">www.katshoa.com</a>, who specializes in marketing strategy.</b><p></p>
Despite the economic downturn, companies and consumers continue to demonstrate an interest in green products and sustainable business practices due to concerns about energy independence, the world we will leave for future generations, waste management, environmental pollution, and the general desire for a healthier lifestyle.<p></p>

Unfortunately, many companies offering “green” products have difficulty in communicating their message properly.<span id="more-3051"></span> Some simply fall into the trap of slapping such labels as “natural,” “green,” and “eco-friendly” like logos on their products. Others determine that the “green” consumer segment is too narrow to pursue. And meanwhile, the pitfall of screeching “WE’RE GREEN!” to the market may turn away shoppers who are averse to sanctimonious preaching.<p></p>

Companies often become frustrated in identifying a strong green brand because of their failure in two areas:<p></p>

-       <b>Brand attachment</b>: developing a strong emotional attachment between their brand and their customer base.<p></p>

-       <b>Target audience</b>: conveying a broad solution for the general market without zeroing in on a specific consumer behavior or trait.<p></p>

Brand attachment involves four stages of consumer behavior.  Let’s use the supermarket chain, Trader Joe’s, as an example:<p></p>

<b>Brand consciousness</b>. The customer hears a TJ’s ad, starts shopping there, enjoys the consumer experience, and appreciates the fact that they offer organic or vegetarian products.<p></p>

<b>Brand preference</b>. Over time, the customer determines that shopping at Trader Joe’s makes him/her a healthier person, and feels their products are reliable and well-priced.<p></p>

<b>Brand dedication</b>. The customer internalizes the TJ brand’s core values and messages, and believes he/she is in the demographics to which TJ markets: single person or young couple who live the bourgeois bohemian (bobo) lifestyle.<p></p>

<b>Brand affection</b>. Even if the competitor has better prices (Fresh &amp; Easy) or superior quality (Whole Foods), the customer’s commitment to TJ’s is such that he/she becomes a proud alpha-consumer, and will happily pay a premium for their goods.<p></p>

The goal of attaining a strong brand attachment is reaching the last stage. Many companies in the green space try to skip from steps 1 to 4 by slapping on a few trendy words or a tagline in their marketing efforts. But in order to forge a brand identity that will strongly resonate with their customers, they need consistent branding practices that gradually drive the customer from the “brand consciousness” stage to the “brand affection” stage.<p></p>

The second point of branding, target audience, is a bit more difficult. The idea is to become indispensible to a wide spectrum of consumers. Without appealing to a wide audience, the company and its products become marginalized within a narrow market segment, and fail to generate optimum revenues.<p></p>

San Francisco-based <a href="http://methodhome.com/" "target=_new"> Method</a> tackles this issue brilliantly. Method’s products are 100% plant based and are offered in recycled plastic bottles. Their product line is about as green/eco-friendly/sustainable/natural as you can get. Nevertheless, you do not find these overused terms in their literature. Note their tag lines: “people against dirty” and “a cleaner clean.” Method’s management has found that consumers will pay a premium for quality, and their products convey technology, cleanliness, intelligence, and innovation – appealing to a wide audience.<p></p>

Their strategy has worked. Who buys from Method?  Parents who want a clean environment for their children, young professionals who want their space to smell good, real estate agents who want to buy nice housewarming gifts for their clients. And they buy Method’s products through Target, Lowe’s, Costco, and Bed Bath &amp; Beyond:  stores that appeal to a wide audience, and are known for their competitive pricing while selling environmentally friendly products without bombarding consumers with bland “green” messages.<p></p>

These points are just the beginning in building a strong green brand. The main idea is that being green is more than putting a leaf on the bottle and saying you are saving the planet: your company’s brand needs to demonstrate inclusiveness while making customers feel that you are making their life easier. It’s great to recycle, but companies need to stop recycling the same old tired words.<p></p>

If you or your clients have asked you to work on a green branding or marketing campaign, we would like to hear your experiences!<p></p>
<div><a href="http://thedirective.blogspot.com/2010/02/branding-in-green-world-how-to-target.html" target="_blank">The article is also posted on Kat Shoa's blog, which I highly recommend! </a></div>
<a href="http://thedirective.blogspot.com/2010/02/branding-in-green-world-how-to-target.html" target="_blank"><p></p>

</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greengopost.com/branding-in-a-green-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
