
Nike has just released its most recent
sustainability report, and it is quite possibly one of the most compelling and engaging I have ever come across. Few corporate social responsibility reports keep me up past my bedtime: in fact, many hasten that hour. But Nike has launched an
interactive sustainability report that educates,
innovates and brings sustainability alive.
Not all of the news coming from Nike’s Beaverton headquarters is sunny.
Excessive overtime is still a nagging problem in the company’s contract factories, and Nike admits many of the factors are within the company’s control. The complete
elimination of hazardous chemicals from its
supply chain will take time. And the company’s water footprint
is still huge. But Nike is charging ahead with a sustainability agenda that just a few years ago would have seemed
unthinkable. And rather than taking a self-congratulatory tone, Nike draws stakeholders in
on its journey to share the company’s successes and shortcomings.
One example of how Nike engages stakeholders is by demonstrating the impact that the 16,000 various materials used to manufacture its sporting apparel have on the environment. A tour of the
Nike Material Index (NMI) allows users to compare organic versus conventionally grown cotton, learn about recycled polyester and how it outperforms nylon, and explains the various components that comprise a pair of athletic shoes. While users design their version of green athletic fashion, they learn how Nike assesses the overall sustainability performance of the materials based on energy, chemistry, water and
waste. Jargon that often weighs down sustainability reports is replaced, dare I say, with fun.
Such an exercise is important because it reminds customers about the
challenges that emerge with the convergence of performance and sustainability. Leather, for example, is sourced from tanneries that are certified by the Leather Working Group (LWG). More consumers would rather avoid leather altogether, and Nike is open to synthetic alternatives. But all synthetics on the market use solvents that are harmful to the environment. To that end, Nike in some ways is not just a branded athletic wear company, but a
chemistry research and development firm. Curiously, Nike is becoming a leader in green chemistry that would make companies like
Dow Chemical squirm.
From waste diversion to improving labor rights to revamping its manufacturing operations, Nike’s driving goal is
accomplish what seems impossible: stay profitable in a world with constrained resources. The company has structured its
long term plan at three levels:
aim for what it aspires to do, set
targets and demonstrate
commitments for each goal. Such an approach works because it keeps the company focused on its long term goals, holds the company accountable to what it has promised stakeholders and prevents Nike from setting expectations too high.
Start exploring the company’s
corporate responsibility report and see for yourself. What Nike has accomplished is far more than just demonstrating that it is a clothing manufacturing company that is doing good. In fact, exploring the site makes you wonder why Nike still bothers with shoes and athletic gear - it should become a sustainability strategy consulting firm in its own right.
Published earlier today on Triple Pundit. Reposted on PSFK on May 4, 2012.
Photo courtesy Nike.
About The Author
Leon Kaye
Leon Kaye is the founder and editor of GreenGoPost.com and its advisory division,
GGP Media.
Contact him to discuss how he can work with your organization or event.
His focus is making the business case for sustainability and corporate social responsibility (CSR).
He writes for San Francisco-based
Triple Pundit,
Inhabitat and now
The Guardian, for which he writes about corporate responsibility, water, and green building. He has also written for AIA's
Architect Magazine.
Leon works out of Fresno and Silicon Valley, California, and when he has free time, he enjoys hiking, gardening, cooking, weightlifting, and planning his next trip to one of the 60 countries he has visited. He has an MBA from USC's Marshall School of Business and is also a proud graduate of the University of Maryland-Baltimore County (UMBC) and Cal State-Fresno.
Pingback: Nike: A Cinderella story | Musing On The World
Pingback: MIT Study Shows that Sustainability is Profitable | greengopost.com
Pingback: HP’s Long Journey Towards Closed Loop Recycling | greengopost.com
Pingback: Fair Trade Clothing is Dead- Can We Save the Union Label? | greengopost.com
Pingback: Nike With the Help of Hackers Unlocking Secrets of Sustainable Materials | greengopost.com
Pingback: Christian Siriano and The Democratization of Design | greengopost.com
Pingback: Our 2000th Post: Who Inspires Us | greengopost.com
Pingback: Puma On The Prowl For Leather Alternatives | greengopost.com
Pingback: Selling Sustainability WITHIN Corporate America | greengopost.com
Pingback: Work on GRI Annual Sustainability Report’s External Feedback Committee Done | greengopost.com
Pingback: Selling Sustainability WITHIN Corporate America | greengopost.com/wptest