Less NOx and SOx = more tots?

Jun 03, 2009 No Comments by
air pollution2I love The Economist.  I guess the UK has to have one tame level-headed publication considering its outrageous tabloids and magazines.  The latest little tidbit I ran into on their web site quoted an MIT professor’s study that basically says Not that a recession is good . . . it means promising economic initiatives such as renewable energy projects get canned . . . and hospitals and health services get cut . . . but then again, those kids who survive will contribute to our economy and culture in a generation’s time . . .

 . . . a drop in pollution equals a drop in infant deaths.  After the USA’s peak in manufacturing back in 1979, and at times when economic output dropped, it’s quite simple . . . less pollutants in the air means more kids are running around in it.

air - land - quality of life

About the author

Leon Kaye is the founder and editor of GreenGoPost.com and its advisory division, GGP Media. Contact him to discuss how he can work with your organization or event. His focus is making the business case for sustainability and corporate social responsibility (CSR). He writes for San Francisco-based Triple Pundit, Inhabitat and now The Guardian, for which he writes about waste, water, and green building. He has also written for AIA's Architect Magazine. Leon lives in Los Angeles, and when he has free time, he enjoys hiking, gardening, cooking, weightlifting, and planning his next trip to one of the 50+ countries he has visited. He has an MBA from USC's Marshall School of Business and is also a proud graduate of the University of Maryland-Baltimore County (UMBC) and Cal State-Fresno.
No Responses to “Less NOx and SOx = more tots?”

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to comments.