A Million Promises, but Not Many Trees

May 24, 2010 3 Comments by
I actually wrote this two months ago, but waited to post this because I did not want to jeapordize Parkman Triangle, the project on which I have worked for several months.

March 25, 2010

One thing I have noticed about Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and his deputies is that they are really good at telling Angelinos what they are going to do, but never discuss what they have accomplished. I've witnessed this trend of empty platitudes at several events I have attended over the past year, where the deputy-to-the-deputy-to-the-deputy assistant will crow about the Mayor's plans--especially on anything smacking of sustainability. Unfortunately, they have nothing to brag about because 5 years later, the mayor really hasn't done anything. He's a great salesman, very personable, but I have to say he's an empty suit.

One of Villaraigosa's first initiatives was his 1,000,000 Tree Campaign for a greener Los Angeles. The project was ambitious. By having residents take online tests and then getting trees for their yards, homeowners would plant these trees, which would provide shade and help heal LA's dirty air. Other trees were given away at city events and street fairs. But even a few years ago, it was clear that the million tree initiative had problems: the city had no way of monitoring how the trees were taken care of, while other trees sufferred from lack of water. Furthermore, while the city gave young saplings away, other trees were chopped down because of sidewalks buckling or street widening.

let us out of this jail, we are thirsty!Well, never mind those facts: today I went to the city nursery to pick up some trees for Parkman Triangle. The task seemed simple enough: pick up three trees between 7:30 and 4:00. Well, long story short, neither of the employees were there. The miscommunication was annoying, but even more upsetting was that the problems with the million tree initiative lie at the source.

Never mind the fact that the two city employees at the Los Angeles Conservation Corps, which maintains the trees, were not at their Griffith Park office, despite the fact that this location was supposedly open all day, four days a week. Walking around the yard revealed some disturbing facts: employees were trying to water nursery plants, though they were more successful at watering the asphalt; another employee used so much water washing his forklift (while another employee sat their and watched) that the asphalt road going down the hill was slathered in water; most of the trees, in 5-gallon buckets, looked as if they lacked any watering; and a peek through the chain linklet me finish my burrito, please fences revealed many trees and plants that were dead or dying--some were just strewn around the yard. I guess they don't think, or care, that some local residents may drop by the facility.

all this for a forklift?Word is out that the program is being dismantled. And we ended up buying trees from a nursery. Regardless, dealing with this one city program was a heinous experience. My peek around the Griffith Park nursery was one example why so many Angelinos are just tired of him . . . and tired of disengaged city employees.

Is this million tree initiative really that ambitious, or has it been ambushed by mismanagement? I'm curious what other Angelinos think.

air - land - quality of life, politics

About the author

Leon Kaye is the founder and editor of GreenGoPost.com and its advisory division, GGP Media. Contact him to discuss how he can work with your organization or event. His focus is making the business case for sustainability and corporate social responsibility (CSR). Currently he is in the United Arab Emirates exploring opportunities. He writes for San Francisco-based Triple Pundit, and now The Guardian , where he writes about waste, water, low carbon initiatives, and green building. He has also written for AIA's Architect Magazine. Leon lives in San Jose, the capital of Silicon Valley, and when he has free time, he enjoys hiking, gardening, cooking, weightlifting, and planning his next trip to one of the 50+ countries he has visited. He has an MBA from USC's Marshall School of Business and is also a proud graduate of the University of Maryland-Baltimore County (UMBC) and Cal State-Fresno.

3 Responses to “A Million Promises, but Not Many Trees”

  1. Margie says:

    It’s both mismanagement and an over ambitious plan. This mayor has a history of speaking before he knows all the facts, such as, is this realistic, how will we support this project, what is the impact on the people of Los Angeles, how will employees be held accountable, etc.? He likes to show up at events, get his picture taken, and take trips to DC where he hopes to be noticed by his party and thought of for more ambitous “job”s. He can’t even do the job that the misguided people of LA gave him. I was disheartened when he was elected; that feeling has turned to despair as he plays out his term. I fear he touts sustainability simply because he believes it is a popular buzz word, not because he cares about it. This is a disaster for Los Angeles. Don’t forget his big plan of a million pot holes being taken care of…
    Margie Pabigian

  2. Leon Kaye says:

    Thanks Margie–I think a lot of people feel about A.V. the way you and I do. It’s true– “1,000,000″ trees is a great buzz word, and it’s catchy. But there was no plan for accountability, which is why the program is such a mess–and will have the plug on it pulled soon (if it hasn’t already!).

  3. LA’s Mayor Bikes, Falls, Promises More Bike Paths – Will He Fall Again? says:

    [...] initiatives have flopped:  Villaraigosa’s plan to have one million trees planted resulted in many trees dying in city lots while only a small portion actually were planted—and not accounted for; his city planner retired [...]

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to comments.